Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Lucy´s Story

This podcast follows the heart wrenching story of Lucy the chimpanzee.  In an effort to better understand the psychological state of the chimpanzee´s brain, several scientists decided to raise Lucy as they would a human child.  Later, Jamie was brought into the picture, first as a caretaker, then as Lucy’s main human connection.  Lucy’s life story is the saddening tale of a chimpanzee that finds herself stranded in the gulf between two species, unable to be human, but not exactly chimpanzee.
                Lucy had many human-like qualities that were almost uncanny.  For example, she could use language in a way that showed her grasp of it.  She also responded sexually to images of human males, and was able to recognize and respond to human emotion with emotional feedback herself.  I would classify her as one of the animals that people argue should be classified as “non-human persons”.  Because of this quality, when her “parents” decided to terminate the Lucy experiment, there was a bit of a problem.  They brought Lucy to a nature reserve, but she was showing signs of severe stress, such as infections.  So Jamie ended up taking Lucy and several other experimental chimpanzees.  She took them to a deserted island. Most of the chimpanzees adjusted, but Lucy clung to Jamie for more than a year.  However, after many battles of will, Lucy adjusted to the area and lived there until she died.
                I think one of the big things I will remember is the ethics of this story.  Taking a chimpanzee and making tem human enough to no longer be a chimpanzee, but not human enough to be human, then to abandon them in this in-between state is completely unethical.  You leave the animal with nowhere to fit in.  How can we force that on any person, human or not?  I think it’s sad, that we saw this depth of genuine emotion in Lucy, but were unable to accommodate for her physical needs.  It brings forward the issue of non-human persons.  Should chimpanzees be classified in this category?  One thing’s for sure: leaving these chimpanzees in this half state in immoral and unethical.

2 comments:

  1. Do you disagree with the experiment as a whole or just with the way that Lucy was put into retirement?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I disagree with the experiment, because I feel that not enough thought went into the end of the experiment in the beginning. I think that it's unethical to not have a contingency plan for this result, and the experiment should not have been conducted without an idea of the results, because that was obviously an issue at the end of the experiment.

    ReplyDelete